Collaboration in more than 46 countries.

You are leaving the country website to access another site in the group. Regulatory constraints and medical practices vary from country to country. Consequently, the information provided on the site in which you enter may not be suitable for use in your country.

NORTH AMERICA

Canada

United States

LATIN AMERICA

Argentina

Brazil

Mexico

Perú

GLOBAL

CEVA Global

EMEA (REGIONAL)

Denmark

Egypt

France

Germany

Hungary

Italy

Netherlands

Poland

Portugal

Romania

South Africa

Spain

Sweden

Tunisia

Turkey

Ukraine

United Kingdom

ASIA PACIFIC

Asia Pacific (Regional)

China

India

Indonesia

Japan

Korea

Malaysia

Philippines

OBJECTIVES

Q fever is a ubiquitous disease in cattle, sheep and goat farms. In France, a study has shown that nearly 30% of cattle herds have cattle seropositive for Q fever (Gache et al., 2017)1. The diagnosis of Q fever remains a daily challenge for practitioners (Viavoice 2020 study, Perceptions of farmers and animal and human health professionals on Q fever)2. While diagnostic methods during an abortive episode have progressed, combining PCR and serological analyses3, screening for Q fever without abortions remains uncommon.

A first step in herds with reproductive problems may be to identify if Coxiella burnetii is actively circulating. The objective of this study was thus to evaluate the frequency of detection of Coxiella burnetii by PCR applied to tank milk, in dairy cattle herds for which reproductive performance is disappointing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two methods of animal recruitment were implemented, each corresponding to a different entry route for triggering investigations when reproductive troubles are suspected.

Firstly, recruitment via veterinarians was implemented. Eligible dairy cattle herds had to present both a clinical suspicion of Q fever “excluding abortion” (abnormal incidence of metritis, retained placentas, premature and/or weak calves) as well as an alert on reproductive performance: rate of renewal, success rate at first artificial insemination (AI), number of cows and heifers with more than 3 AI, objectified in particular by figures compared to the first quartile of the breed concerned on the website of the French observatory for cattle reproduction (Reproscope). Knowledge of farms has allowed to refute the involvement of most of the other classic factors negatively impacting reproduction (e.g., feeding, management, building, other health problems). Thus 288 farms were recruited between June 2020 and December 2021.

At the same time, recruitment was implemented by analyzing the annual reproduction reports, resulting from performance checks in September 2021. Farms located in Pays de la Loire (France) were targeted for poor reproductive performance. To limit bias, only Holstein breed herds of more than 30 animals, with a barn average between 8500 and 9500 kg/L/year were considered. Eligible herds had to have 3 degraded reproduction criteria (success rate at first AI, rate of cows with more than 3 AI and percentage of late returns in heat according to the annual reproduction report as of March 31, 2021). 136 farms among this population were targeted.

The analysis method was the same in both cases: real-time PCR on bulk tank milk.

RESULTS

  • In the first population, 46% of the 288 farms investigated by veterinarians had a positive PCR, attesting an active circulation of the bacterium on the farm, and with a probability that Q fever was the cause of the poor reproductive performances observed. On these farms, the continuation of the investigations to confirm a suspicion of Coxiella burnetii involvement may be relevant (for example with individual serological surveys on cows with reproductive problems).
  • Of the 136 farms with reproductive problems targeted during the performance check, 21.3% were positive.

Share this publication:

Publication file:

Download publication
This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.