Collaboration in more than 46 countries.

You are leaving the country website to access another site in the group. Regulatory constraints and medical practices vary from country to country. Consequently, the information provided on the site in which you enter may not be suitable for use in your country.

NORTH AMERICA

Canada

United States

LATIN AMERICA

Argentina

Brazil

Mexico

Perú

GLOBAL

CEVA Global

EMEA (REGIONAL)

Denmark

Egypt

France

Germany

Hungary

Italy

Netherlands

Poland

Portugal

Romania

South Africa

Spain

Sweden

Tunisia

Turkey

Ukraine

United Kingdom

ASIA PACIFIC

Asia Pacific (Regional)

China

India

Indonesia

Japan

Korea

Malaysia

Philippines

Publications

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the treatment of mild and moderate mastitis with ketoprofen to the usual treatment with intra-mammary antibiotics.

Materials and Methods

A randomized, multi-herd, non-inferiority study was carried out to compare two treatments of non-severe mastitis cases. The animals in the studied group were treated with systemic NSAID (ketoprofen (KE); KE group; n=104), followed by antibiotic treatment only in cases without clinical improvement, while the animals in the reference group (AB group) received an intramammary antibiotic (n=118) (Figure 1). The study included 222 cases of non-severe clinical mastitis on three conventional dairy farms in Northern Germany between November 2022 and November 2023. Study outcomes were clinical cure at day 5, bacteriological cure, CM recurrence in a period of 60 days and new infection risk. Mixed logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of treatment on outcomes. The non-inferiority assumption was checked with the confidence interval of the treatment difference for clinical cure at day 5, calculating using the least square means and their standard deviations.

Results

With regard to the clinical cure on day 5, the treatment in the KE group was inferior. Clinical cure [84.7% (100/118 and 61.5% (64/104)] and bacteriological cure [79.3% (73/92) and 61.2% (41/67)] were significantly higher in the AB group than in the KE group. The risks for recurrent cases [7.3% (8/109) and 15.7% (14/89)] were significantly lower in the AB group than in the KE group. The new infection risk did not differ significantly between the treatment groups [6.8% 50 (8/118) in the AB group and 6.7% (7/104) in the KE group]. In 87% of the cases (n=90) of the KE group, a subsequent antibiotic treatment was not necessary to reach clinical cure on day 5 (Figure 1).

conclusions

Treatment of mild and moderate mastitis with ketoprofen represents an alternative that promoted the deliberate and selective use of antibiotics. Furthermore, as ketoprofen has no withdrawal period for milk, less milk was discarded in the ketoprofen group than in the antibiotic group. However, some limitations with regard to treatment efficacy in Gram-positive mastitis were observed. A targeted mastitis concept based on the identification of the bacterium involved could help to select cases to be treated with ketoprofen alone and therefore to overcome this limitation.

Share this publication:

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.